Tuesday, July 26, 2011 - 08:38 PM UTC
"Dear Mr. Stephen Lawson,

Greeting from sunny and very hot Kiev! With this message I inform you that a parcel with two new model kits. The 1:72 Nieuport 27 C.1 (# 061) & 1:48 DeHavilland DH 4 with RAF3 engine and will be sent to your address in several weeks. Please, let me know as soon as you receive it.
Sincerely,
Olga"
Nieuport 27 C.1:
The Nieuport 27 was a French biplane fighter aircraft during World War I designed by Gustave Delage. The model 27 was the last of the line of Nieuport "V-strut" single seat fighters stemming from the Bébé of early 1916. A few operational examples supplemented the very similar Nieuport 24bis in operational squadrons in late 1917 but most examples of the type served as advanced trainers. It basically was an up engined type 24 with a split axle like the Sopwith fighter types.

Airco DeHavilland DH 4
The Airco DH.4 was a British two-seat biplane day-bomber of the First World War. It was designed by Geoffrey de Havilland (hence "DH") for Airco, and was the first British two seat light day-bomber to have an effective defensive armament. It first flew in August 1916 and entered service with the Royal Flying Corps (RFC) in March 1917. The majority of DH.4s were actually built as general purpose two-seaters in the USA, for service with the American forces in France.

The DH.4 was tried with several engines,this version had the The RAF 3. It was a British liquid-cooled, V-12 engine developed for aircraft use during World War I. Based on the eight–cylinder RAF 1 it was designed by the Royal Aircraft Factory but produced by the two British companies of Armstrong Whitworth and Napier & Son. The RAF 7 was a high compression version of the same engine.

RAF 3 1914 - Prototype engine, 200 horsepower (150 kW).
RAF 3a 1914 - Main production variant, increased bore, 260 horsepower (194 kW). 29 built by Armstrong Whitworth, 260 built by Napier & Son.
RAF 7 300 horsepower (224 kW) high compression version with high-lift camshafts.



Click Star to Rate
2 readers have rated this story.
Get a daily email with links to all our latest news, reviews, and features.

Comments

Awesome! That is Sidney Cotton's DH4- I think this RAF engined version is the only variant Roden hasn't already covered? It's not my scale, and I already have the Pegasus 1/72 to build this aircraft, but it is great to see this scheme being used in a kit.
JUL 27, 2011 - 11:03 AM
I was wondering whether anyone could shed light on Roden's choice of colours on the decals of the roundels for the wings of the DH4 on the box art? Why have they chosen to put the white on the outer circle? See: http://modelingmadness.com/scotts/w1/roden/432.htm I have a photo of this aircraft, and two of its twin, but none show the wing roundels clearly. If anyone could tell me what words (names?) on white backgrounds are in the decals for either side of the cockpit exterior, I would appreciate it very much.
SEP 30, 2011 - 09:23 AM
Greetings Ben, On the cockades, the white border was something that began showing up on British Aircraft after May 1917. It was after the adoption of the dark-colored PC10 and PC12 finishes, British overwing and fuselage roundels appeared with a thin white border to set them off from the background. Underwing roundels painted against CDL retained the unbordered form.
SEP 30, 2011 - 03:04 PM
Hi Stephen, and thanks for your post, but I am referring to the wing roundels that Roden have done with wide white outer rings, blue, then red centre- i.e. they have swapped the blue and the white. Look closely at the scan of the decal sheet on modellingmadness- the outer white is hard to see against the backing paper. The only thing that could suggest this is the non-standard order of the fin flash- white, blue then red. Sidney Cotton claimed he designed the camouflage, and he didn't have the highest respect for rules and bureaucracy, but I would have thought he would have followed the standard roundel pattern (as the photographic evidence shows he did on the fuselage ones).
OCT 01, 2011 - 05:44 AM
Greetings Ben, I have done a bit of searching on some comments made by Alex Imrie. It seems the upper surface wing cockades may have been "subdued". He noted the Sopwith Triplanes of Naval 10 had received orders to have PC (10 or 12) painted over the white of the middle ring. As a guess on my part - the outer white ring on the DH 4 kit decals might be interpreting the original blue with the inner middle white ring getting a heavy coat of ultramarine to subdue it? The subdued outer ring could be in a similar lt blue as the camouflage? Is there anything in the Datafiles that covers this? Being stationed to patrol the seaway canal the blue might have been attempt to subdue the scheme even further? ". . .Many home defense machines, however, remained in their standard “day” PC10 finish. To tone down the appearance of the national markings, the white portions of the roundels and rudder stripes were often overpainted with PC10, black, red or blue. . ." (From comments on the National markings employed in WWI by Eric Goedkoop). By the way - "The Kiel Canal (German: Nord-Ostsee-Kanal, NOK), known as the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Kanal (after Kaiser Wilhelm I), until 1948, is a 61-mile (98-kilometre) long canal in the German Bundesland Schleswig-Holstein that links the North Sea at Brunsbüttel to the Baltic Sea at Kiel-Holtenau. . ." Also for those interested in famous Sidney Cotton, here is a bit of fun.
OCT 01, 2011 - 03:29 PM
Interesting Stephen! Certainly gives a few more possibilities. I thought I would post the only known (to me) photo of this aircraft:
OCT 03, 2011 - 05:26 AM
THIS STORY HAS BEEN READ 7,592 TIMES.
ADVERTISEMENT

Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
Roden ReviewsMORE
Pt-17 Kaydet Built Review
by Kevin Brant | of 1 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Focke-Wulf FW200C-6 Condor In-Box Review
by Kevin Brant
Boeing 307 In-Box Review
by Is a secret
Britannia 312 In-Box Review
by Is a secret | of 2 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Heinkel He 51B-1 In-Box Review
by Rowan Baylis | of 2 ratings, 100% found this helpful
C-123B Provider In-Box Review
by Is a secret | of 1 ratings, 100% found this helpful
PC-6 B2/H4 In-Box Review
by Richard Tonge
Boeing 720 In-Box Review
by Is a secret | of 2 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Douglas DC-3 In-Box Review
by Is a secret
Douglas C-47 build Built Review
by Richard Tonge | of 1 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Trojan C In-Box Review
by Richard West
Douglas C-47 In-Box Review
by Richard Tonge | of 1 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Globemaster II Built Review
by Tim Hatton | of 1 ratings, 100% found this helpful
ATL.98 Carvair In-Box Review
by Tim Hatton | of 3 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Turbo Porter float plane In-Box Review
by Richard Tonge | of 2 ratings, 100% found this helpful

ADVERTISEMENT